CHAPTER ONE
1.0
INTRODUCTION
In recent time the world economy has developed tremendously and
this has been linked with activities of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises
(SMEs), especially in developing countries. A Study carried out by the Federal
Office of Statistics shows that in Nigeria, Small and Medium Scale Enterprises
make up 97% of productive units of the economy (Ariyo, 2005). Although smaller
in size, they are the most important enterprises in the economy due to the fact
that when all the individual effects are aggregated, they surpass that of the
larger companies. The social and economic advantages of small and medium scale
enterprises cannot be overstated. Panitchparkdi (2006) sees SMEs as a source of
employment, competition, economic dynamism, and innovation which stimulates the
entrepreneurial spirit and the diffusion of skills. Because they enjoy a wider
geographical presence than big companies, SMEs also contribute to better income
distribution. Over the years, small and medium scale enterprises have been an
avenue for job creation and the empowerment of Nigeria’s citizens providing
about 50% of all jobs in Nigeria and also for local capital formation. Being
highly innovative, they lead to the utilization of our natural resources which
in turn translates to increasing the country’s wealth through higher
productivity. Small and medium scale enterprises have undoubtedly improved the
standard of living of so many people especially those in the rural areas
(Ariyo, 2005).
However, the mortality rate of these small firms is very high.
According to the Small and Medium Scale Enterprises Development Agency of
Nigeria (SMEDAN), 80% of SMEs die before their 5th anniversary.
Among the factors responsible for these untimely close-ups are tax related
issues, ranging from multiple taxations to enormous tax burdens among other
issues etc. In many government policies, small and medium scale enterprises are
usually viewed and treated in the same light as large corporations. However,
their size and nature make them unique. Therefore, in dealing with small and
medium scale enterprises, these unique qualities need to be considered. In
levying of taxes for these enterprises in particular, issues that need to be
considered are how these tax policies can be designed to bolster the growth of
SMEs and the most effective ways to administer them. The importance of SMEs as
a mechanism of economic growth and development is often ignored.
They are perceived as minute establishments that have minimal
effect on the state of the economy. However, if favorable environment is
created for these SMEs to grow through proper regulation, the SMEs sector has
the highest propensity to transform our economy. In the same light, taxes are
important for the government as they are the major source of funds for
government expenditure. Income obtained from taxation of individuals and
businesses are used to run governments as well as provide infrastructure such
as good roads, water supply, and electricity which are essential for the smooth
running of these businesses that are mainly manufacturing companies and as such
rely on these commodities to survive.
However, Holban (2007) posited that taxation can contribute to
development and welfare through three sources; It must be able to generate
sufficient funds for financing public services and social transfers at a high
level of quality, it should offer incentive for more employment and for an
efficient and lasting use of natural resources, finally it should be able to
reallocate income. But in the case of SMEs, tax must be imposed in such a way
that puts their income and need for survival into consideration. It is
expedient that enough profit is allowed them for the purpose of expanding their
businesses. The tax policy must be one that will not encourage SMEs to remain
in the informal sector or to evade or avoid tax payments. More so, many small
firms in Africa, including Nigeria, choose to remain in the informal sector
because the perceived benefits outweigh the perceived costs. Firms rarely see
their tax contributions at work and the compliance costs are high, thus
discouraging compliance. The government is also discouraged from collecting
taxes from small firms, because the cost of monitoring and collecting taxes
from small businesses by revenue authorities, whose resources are usually
scarce, sometimes outweighs the revenues generated by small businesses (Stem
and Barbour 2005).
Taxation increases
incentives for public participation in the political process and creates
pressure for more accountability, better governance, and improved efficiency of
government spending. Taxation also creates incentives for governments to
upgrade their institutions for tax collection and administration and to provide
more public services (Moore, 2007).
Taxes have existed virtually
as long as there have been organized governments. The first tax law legislation
was introduced in 1919 and ever since then taxes have evolved through a number
of reforms. The government in an attempt to widen the tax base and collect more
revenue has had to levy several taxes especially on business enterprises in
Nigeria which constitute a large part of the formal sector. The taxes charged
on business enterprises in Nigeria include; corporation tax, value added tax,
presumption tax and exercise duty. In 1997 the Income Tax Act was made. This
was to give guidance in assessment and computation of taxes (Campsy, 1997). The
Nigerian government has made some recommendable efforts to promote development
through taxation since the inception of the current taxation laws for purposes
of promoting development. The main objective of taxation in Nigeria has always
been to mobilise resources needed to meet the aspiration of government. This is
because for any government to be effective, strong, competent and capable of
spearheading development, resources have to be readily available in its
treasury so as to be in position to provide goods and services to the people
adequately. The Nigerian government has always had to ensure proper resource
mobilization (Musa, 1992).
According to Manasseh
(2000), a tax is generally referred to as a compulsory levy imposed by
government upon assets of various categories and taxation is a compulsory and
non refundable contribution imposed by government for public purposes. In
Nigeria a considerable fraction of the businesses are sole traders operating
small scale business, locally owned and managed by individuals or families and
often with very few employees working at a single location (Nigeria development
bank report, 1988). Taxation in Nigeria is based on system that existed in
Britain as it was a British colony. This also applied to other colonies
elsewhere and for East Africa, one tax system operated under British
administration. This process began in 1900 with the hut tax regulation which
imposed a standard charge for every hut/dwelling.
During that period, taxation
was aimed at raising revenue for the administrative structure imposed by the
colonial government but also as a means of encouraging monetary/economic
activities. It was the Local Authority Ordinance of 1991 that governed the
collection of taxes. In September 1991, after a period of review the URA was
established. All taxes including income tax came under the umbrella of the URA.
From 1992, URA has been organizing and strengthening the administrative
procedures and in 1993 this process assisted by a grant from the British
government of approximately US$ 10million.
Kano state is located in
Nigeria. At least 50 small scale business enterprises were selected in Kano
municipal, capital of Kano state and almost all of them employ 2-4 people.
These small scale businesses are locally owned and managed by private
individuals who sometimes employ their family members. These small scale
businesses bear a wide tax burden which has led to poor performance. Therefore,
it was against this background that the researcher undertook the study to
investigate more about the problem using Kano state as a case study to evaluate
the impact of taxes on performance of small scale business enterprises.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Taxes are raised by the governments to generate revenue used
to provide services to the public such as; Health centers, telecommunication,
roads, schools and electricity and this have helped to improve on the
performance of small scale business enterprises. Despite the services provided,
small scale business enterprise’s performance in Rivers State is still poor.
This could be due to the increasing tax burden brought about by tax rates which
are revised annually. These rates seem to be taking an upward trend (Gordon and
Dawson, 1987) which has led to winding up of some small scale business
enterprises. This prompted the researcher to investigate more about the impact
of taxes on performance of small scale business enterprises.
1.4
Objectives of the Study
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of taxes
on performance of small scale business enterprises in Kano State. However the
following are the specific objectives of the study.
- To determine the effect of the levied taxes on profitability of SMEs in Kano state
- To determine the effect of taxes on annual sales growth of SMEs companies in Kano state.
- To assess whether multiple taxation has significant effect on the failure of SMEs in Kano state
1.5 Research
Questions
- What is the effect of the levied taxes on profitability of SMEs in Kano state
- What is the effect of taxes on annual sales growth of SMEs companies in Kano state.
- Does multiple taxation has significant effect on the failure of SMEs in Kano state
1.6 Scope of
the study
The study covers small scale businesses in Rivers State.
Specifically, the study investigates the performance of small scale businesses,
the awareness of the tax payers regarding their obligations, the problems faced
by the tax payers and the relationship between the taxes paid and the
performance of the small scale businesses. The study is carried out in Kano State,
Nigeria. The area is purposely selected because the researcher schools within
the vicinity and this therefore facilitates data collection.
1.7
Significance of the study
The findings of the study are significant on the following
ways;
- To scholars and researchers, the findings of the study are expected to contribute to the existing literature about taxation and the effect it causes to the economy as a whole.
- To the tax authority and government, the study will guide them in adjusting tax policies so that they suit requirements of small scale businesses.
- To future academicians especially of Nigeria University students, the study will help in gaining insight about taxes and performance of small scale business enterprises.
- The accomplishment of the study will enable the researcher to acquire hands on skills about processing of research work and data analysis. This proficiency will enable the researcher to handle such related work with a lot of precision and proficiency.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
For some decades now, Nigeria has depended on oil for its major
income and foreign exchange. Oil accounts for about 80 percent of federal
government revenues, and 95 percent of foreign exchange earnings (Chu, 2008).
The National Centre for Economic Management and Administration (NCEMA) reports
that Nigeria, with a population of about 160 million, is Africa’s most populous
country and the continent’s third largest economy yet it still remains one of
the poorest oil producing countries. With a continuously declining per capita
income, comparatively unfavorable social indicators, dynamic world economy and
the fact that countries are looking into alternative sources of energy it is
time to begin to look into alternative sources of income for sustenance in the
long run when the demand for oil will dwindle to nothing. Therefore, it would
not hurt to diversify the economy even before the demand for petroleum products
finally diminishes. This means it is time to pay more attention to the other
sectors of the economy.
This translates into looking at non-oil based sectors in Nigeria
such as agriculture, manufacturing, commerce and tourism. These industries are
primarily made up of SMEs, as such it goes without saying that SMEs are
important to the Nigerian economy. The country is blessed with fertile
farmlands, vast mineral deposits and a wealth of human resource, making it a
very favorable place for small and medium enterprises. These resources have
placed Nigeria in a prominent position in Africa. For governments; however,
large companies are a more attractive, more clear-cut and less complex set than
SMEs. In designing public policies, particularly tax policies, governments have
usually targeted the large companies (Holban, 2007). Therefore, there is a need
to devise methods to encourage the growth and development of these enterprises
so as to ensure that they reach their full potential. Subsequently, a favorable
business and regulatory environment needs to be created for them to thrive.
Thus, for this study, the focus will be on supporting SMEs growth through tax
policy. Most large companies have their roots in small and medium enterprises;
they started out as SMEs before expansion. This means that the future large
corporations are the SMEs of today that should be nurtured to ensure their
growth and transformation to large scale enterprises. Furthermore, they are
generally perceived to be the seedbed for indigenous entrepreneurship and to
generate all the many small investments, which would otherwise not have taken
place (Aryeetey & Ahene, 2004).Therefore, Nigeria needs to encourage the
development of its private sector by creating a friendly environment for the growth of SMEs, strengthening the factors
that lead to business success, and addressing the problems threatening the
existence and advancement of small and medium enterprises (Chu, Kara &
Benzing, 2008) With the dismantling of trade and other barriers.
Consequently, SMEs in developing countries are struggling to
survive under intense competitive environments both domestic and international.
In developing countries like Nigeria, there is an urgent need to provide the
required enabling environment for the development of SMEs, so that they could
adequately play the role expected of them in economic transformation, Such role
includes mobilization of domestic savings for investment, appreciable
contribution to gross domestic product, increased harnessing of local raw
materials, employment generation, and significant contribution towards poverty
reduction efforts through sustainable livelihoods and enhancement in personnel
income, technological development and export diversification (Smatrakalev,
2006). It is for this reason that an ideal tax policy needs to be adopted in
order to ensure economic growth and proper utilization of resources. However
this is not the case because taxes are levied for regulating the investment
behavior of the households and not for suffocating any entrepreneur initiative
which seem to be a major constraint to the development of the SMEs they are out
to cater for.
Olorunshola (2003), the concept of SMEs is relative and dynamic.
The characteristics of SMEs are uncertainty, innovation and evolution. A firm
understanding of SMEs would require a good knowledge of its features. In
Nigeria, SMEs usually lack efficient organizational structure and management
culture while the urban SMEs are more structured, the rural ones are less
structured. This represents one of the most important characteristic of SMEs in
Nigeria. SMEs are in most cases a one man business or partnerships enterprise,
although they may be registered as limited liability company, (Udechukay,
2003). Olurunshola (2003) affirmed that this ownership style has led small and
main enterprise to have a simple management structure and make it easier to
manage than that of large firms, and few numbers of staff and in some cases low
level of education of some owners of SMEs. SMEs almost share the same
characteristic with a sole proprietorship in that, there is no legal
personality between the SMEs and their owners, which means that the life span
of SMEs depends on the life of the owners; when the owner dies, the business
dies alongside. Another feature of the
SMEs sector in some countries is its heterogeneous nature, ranging from retail
outlets to hugely paid professionals and substantially manufactured
organisation small and medium enterprise are also likely to vary in
organizational form, from sole proprietorship (one man business), scale
corporations (public or private), professionals and partnerships.
Furthermore, the processes of production in SMEs setting are Labour
intensive and manual because of the small capital and they always serve as
supplier to the large manufacturing firms since their products are mostly raw
materials output to the large firm (Hanefah, Ariff and Kasipfflai, 2002). Just
like a one man business SMEs also require low startup capital than large
companies (Akinsulise, 2010).
In addition, the contribution of SMEs to tax revenue is usually
lower than its contributions to output and employment (International Tax
Dialogue, 2007), that notwithstanding SMEs have not become competitive enough
to increase their share of output even though they form three fifths of the
number of manufacturing industries which are solely relied upon by large manufacturing
companies for their supplies (products) (Hanafah et al. 2003).
Depending on the country’s international standing at any point in
time and the economic policies adopted by government, the importance of the
various source of revenue varies from time to time. Nigeria has mixed economy
i.e., government undertakes commercial investment alongside the private sector
with social oriented economic policies, government undertakes greater
commercial investment. Though taxation may not be the most important source of
revenues to government in term of the magnitude of revenue derivable from
taxation, however, taxation is the most important source of revenue to the
government, from the point of view of certainty, and consistency of taxation.
In a social oriented economy, only a small percentage of revenue may be derived
from taxation while in a capitalist oriented economy, a greater percentage of
government revenue, is derivable from taxation (Osita, 2004). According to
Eftekhari (2009), taxation has always been an issue for the government and
taxpayer alike from the early years of civilization. The issue of taxation has
generated a lot of controversy and several political conflicts over time.
According to its importance, several economic thrones have been proposed to run
an effective system. Osita, (2004) sees
taxation as a compulsory levy by government through its various agencies on the
income, capital or consumption of its subjects. Tax is basically of three
structures proportional, progressive and regressive. Proportional tax is define
as a type of tax in which tax payer is levied an amount in proportion to his
earning, progressive tax levies are higher rate on higher income earners, while
the regressive tax is the one that charges higher rate to person receiving
lower income. Tax is classified into two broad categories as direct and
indirect tax.
2.2 Taxation
Taxation is an ancient practice which is as old as the emergence of
an Organised human society known as
state, various studies in the past have
define tax based on the role expected to play in the economy tax is a fee
charge [levied] by government on a product, income or N activity. Where tax is
levied directly on personal or corporate income it is known as direct tax.
While if levied on the price of a good or service then it is called an Indirect
tax. It is a pecuniary burden laid upon individuals or property owns to support the government, a tax is not voluntary
payment or donation but an enforced contribution, exacted pursuant to
legislative authority and is any contribution imposed by government (Parkin,
2006).
The economic definition of taxes is quite different in that
economics does not consider many transfers to government to be taxes. For
example Some transfers’ to the public sector are comparable to prices, this
include tuition at public university, colleges and fees for utilities provided
by local government. (Steven, 1984). In Morden taxation system taxes are levied
on money. The method of Taxation and the government expenditure has been highly
debated in Politics and economics. Tax
collection is preformed by a government
Agency board of internal revenue based on tax act, 1993 (Johnson, 2000).
The importance of tax cannot be over emphasize and still been
collected in Kano long before the coming of colonial administrators. It was collected
by the then local chiefs for the purpose of administration and defence. Every
person was expected to give part of his or her proceeds from cultivation of
land to the state, for the benefit of the community as a whole. Tax policies
represent key resource allocator between the public and private sector in a
country, it is usually imposed on individuals and entity that make up a
country. The funds provided by tax are used by the state to support certain obligations
such as education system, health care system, pension for the elderly, unemployment
benefit, and public transportation (Chinyere, 2000).
Taxes are levied in almost
every country of the world, primarily to raise
revenue for government expenditure although they serve other
purpose as well. In modern economies,
taxes are the most important sources of
Government revenue. They represent a general obligation of tax payers are not levied or paid in exchange for any
particular benefit. The Kano state government has for long been unable to
realised its economic objectives due to
low revenue generation which was as a result Of inefficiency of existing tax
collection procedures, known popularly as
The ortthodoxTax collection procedures [i.e. the use of the staff of
board Of internal Revenue] as sole tax
collectors: most problem of this
Procedure is that it is characterised by in efficiency and massive Corruption There were cases of revenue
collectors printing personal Receipt
booklet and issuing fake receipt to tax payers. Especially the Private business Operators. Consequently,
monies collected as Revenue are not
being properly accounted for, hence the shortfall in tax Revenue estimated over the years. And this
has a very serious economic Implication
for the overall development of Kano state.
2.2.1 Tax
Planning
The implementation situation of SME income tax planning is
distorted tax planning, that is to say, on the one hand, more and more SMEs pay
tax in accordance with the law, and on the other hand, because of the role of
the interest mechanism and other various reasons, more and more SMEs
tax-related cases appear (Karing and Wanjala, 2005). According to the survey,
the vast majorities SME have not yet started or are considering carrying out
tax planning, which can not fight for the legitimate tax interests and ruin
financial interests leading to a large number of emerging additional tax burden
(Fjeldstad and Rakne, 2003). In addition, SME tax planning is treated
unreasonable. Due to the limitations of the concept, SME tax planning
activities often encounter misunderstanding, punishment and censor from some
basic taxation law enforcement agencies (Karing and Wanjala, 2005).
Tax law is said to be barely connected with universal law as we understand
it. However, tax law is founded not only on principles but also on
practicality. There is no element of perpetuity about tax law, only the
constant clash of the immediate and semi permanent (Kibua and Nziok, 2004). A
State cannot run a democracy well without taxation and a taxation system cannot
be run well without democracy. Oliver Wendell Holmes has said on one occasion,
“Taxes are what we pay for civilized society” (Neely et al. 1996).
2.2.2 Prospects of
Tax Collection
Adam smith [1776] identified the following prospects of tax
collection:
1. The administration of tax collection will be strengthened to ensure
more efficient tax collection through training of staff, awareness campaigns
and computerizations.
2. Government should continue to ensure that tariff policy enables our
local industries to be competitive.
3. Specifically aggressive action should be taken to block revenue
leakage on light duty goods and bulk items.
4. Government should ensured fair tax administration base on the
principle of derivation of tax proceeds; it is recommended that the tax law
should be enacted.
5. VAT has become a veritable source of revenue earning for government
and therefore needs to be strengthened and expanded to broaden the tax base and
to bring the VAT administration closer to the tax-payers, new local VAT offices
should be established all over the state.
2.2.2 Problems of
Tax Collection
Lawal, [1982] cited in chinyere [2000] posits that the following
are problems of tax collection:
1.
In adequate staff or manpower
to carryout the assignment efficiently and thus has contributed to the low
revenue generated for the state.
2.
Mismanagement of tax
collected: taxes collected were not been utilized for the purpose for which it
was collected thus makes tax payers not give out their wealth for the state.
3.
Bribery and corruption: in
this day, tax collector personal interest has over ride their official interest
in the performance of their duties consequently affects revenue generation for
the state.
4.
Lack of voluntary compliance
from tax payers these attitudes of tax payer causes tax avoidance evasion an
delinquency.
5.
Poor accounting records, must
business traders professional do not keep proper records of their income and
expenditure.
6.
Inadequate facilities: - the
facilities like motor vehicle, motor cycle to carry out the assignment
effectively is inadequate.
2.2.3 Charecteristic
of Good Tax System
Jean-Jacque [1998] cited in chinyere [2000]
summarised the under listed Characteristic:
1. A good tax system should try to accommodate the attitudes and Problem of tax payers.
2. It should run in harmony with importance of state objectives.
3. A good tax should be flexible enough to move the changing Requirement of the state economy.
4. Tax system should recognise the basic right of the tax of the
tax Payer.
5. It should also yield adequate revenue for the treasury.
2.3 Taxation of SMEs
Atawodi and Ojeka (2012) explained that, the choice of tax policy
to employ depends on the use of one or both two groups of instruments. The
first being the use of special tax preferences and the other incentives to
support start-up and growth of small companies (Atawodi & Ojeka, 2012).
These incentives comprise of the lowering of corporate income tax rates,
special tax exemptions or tax holidays and relieves for small businesses. The underlying
reason for all these is to effectively raise revenue through measures that suit
a country’s circumstances and
administrative capacity (Atawodi & Ojeka, 2012).
Developing countries such as Ghana are usually
struggling in terms of raising internal revenues for development. In order to
solve this issue, scholars have discussed among others that the widening of the
tax net is the way to go. This is due to the urgency to provide infrastructure,
create jobs and reduce unemployment, expand the productive sectors of the
economy and to significantly raise public revenues from the non-oil sectors.
With this process, tax policies are to aim at bringing all taxable adults into the
tax bracket with a graduated rate that should ensure that the well-off pay
their own share while the low income earners are given savings incentives.
An effective and efficient tax administration system should be integral to any
country’s well-being (Atawodi & Ojeka,
2012). It is with this notion that Baurer (2005) argues that the tax
administration must provide an even playing field for business by ensuring that
all taxpayers meet their tax filing and paying requirements.
The authorities and the administrators of taxes
should seek to balance their educational and assistance role with the
enforcement role. According to Atawodi and Ojeka (2012), the rationale behind
the whole system of tax is consistent with two of the three major theories of
tax namely; the Ability-to-Pay
Principle and the Equal Distribution Principle. The two principles stress equality and fairness. The Ability-to-Pay theory is of the view that
individual should be taxed based on the individuals’ ability to pay while on
the other breadth, the Equal distribution Principle
proposes that the incomes, wealth as well as the monetary transactions of the
individuals should be taxed at a fixed percentage. This implies that, the
individuals who earn more and buy more should pay more taxes, but will not pay
a higher rate of taxes (Atawodi & Ojeka, 2012).
2.3.1 Tax Compliance and SMEs
Tax compliance has been seen to be a complex issue to define
according to (Marti, 2010). In simple terms, tax compliance can be defined as
the fulfilment of all tax obligations as specified by the law freely and
completely. It has been found that regulatory burdens fall excessively on small
and medium enterprises (Pope & AbdulJabbar, 2008). The nature and size of
small and medium enterprises makes the issue of tax compliance one of
particular importance (Atawodi & Ojeka, 2012). Especially since most SMEs
have access to limited resources and inadequate expertise to comply with
diverse and complicated regulation. Marti (2010) also believes that high
compliance costs can result in tax avoidance, tax fraud, and inhibit investment
by way of diminishing competitiveness of the country in terms of taxation
attractiveness.
There is also the issue of noncompliance
of tax and this could come in the form
of: the failure to submit a tax return within the required period or total
non-submission of tax returns, understatement of income, overstatement of
deductions, failure to pay assessed taxes by due date. In some cases
noncompliance of tax may mean an outright failure to pay levied taxes. Further,
studies have shown that the problem of tax evasion is a widespread in
development worlds.
Empirical study by Fagbemi, Uadile and Noah (2010) have reported
that noncompliance of tax is prevalent in developing countries and it hinders
development thereby leading to economic stagnation and other social and
economic problems. Chipeta (2002) has identified high tax rates as one of the
reasons of tax evasion. Chipeta (2002) further pointed out that a higher tax
rate increases the burden of the tax payer and reduces his disposable income
hence, the probability of evading tax is higher Many scholars have addressed
the questions that emerge from this literature especially the in-elasticity of
tax location decision with respect to tax differences across jurisdictions. The
issue of incomplete integration between personal and corporate tax has been
addressed. Government need to review tax bias against entrepreneurs and design
tax policies for entrepreneurship to remedy market failures, while avoiding
adverse side effects. Marginal tax rates exert a statistically and
quantitatively significant influence on the growth of firms. Marginal tax rate
may be defined as the amount of tax paid on an additional cedi of income. This leads to the conclusion that raising
income tax inhibits the growth of small firms.
2.4 Performance
of Small Enterprises
Different approaches are used for performance evaluation in which
goal approach, time frame approach, balanced scorecard , system approach, and
ineffectiveness approach are included (Jean-Francois, 2004). In stakeholder
approach, centre of attention is the ability of a business to meet the needs
and expectations of its stakeholders (Daft, 1995).Competing values approach
expands the range of other approaches.
By using competing values approach, four other models are developed
in which rational goal; internal process, open system and human relations are
included (Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1983). Performance of an organization can be
evaluated by focusing on problems and retarding factors that inhibit the
performance of organizations (Camaron, 1984).
Out of the above mentioned approaches, goal approach is the superlative
approach to evaluate the performance due to its straightforwardness (Pfeffer
and Salancik 1978). Most trendy approach of performance evaluation of SME's is
balanced scorecard approach. Balanced scorecard has four dimensions in which
financial growth, quality, customers and learning growth is built-in (Kaplan
and Norton, 1992).Balance scorecard actually focuses on maintaining symmetry
between monetary and non monetary measures (Neely et
al. 1996).
Book-tax differences, on average, are systematically related to
earnings growth, future stock returns, and earnings persistence (Hanlon, 2005)
and among other implications, book-tax differences are useful measures in
evaluating firm performance. Consistent with these studies, Shevlin (2002) and
Hanlon, Laplante, and Shevlin (2005) find that while book income explains a
firm‟s annual stock returns better than estimated taxable income, estimated
taxable income, on average, has incremental explanatory power for book income.
However , there is little evidence regarding taxable income as an alternative
performance measure and, in particular, cross-sectional differences in firms
that mitigates or enhances the ability of taxable income to inform investors
regarding firm performance (Lev and Nissim, 2004).
2.5 Challenges of SMEs
There are a lot of problems that bedevil SMEs and stunt their
growth. Although there are some problems peculiar to a particular country, the
challenges faced by SMEs in different countries and geopolitical divisions are
basically the same. For instance, a survey of Turkish SMEs by Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2004 showed that they were
suffering the consequences of policy inconsistency, poor access to finance,
insufficient know-how and low level of technology, and so many others. The same
problems were also registered by other authors concerning other regions like
the Philippines, Malaysia and other European states and of course in
Sub-Saharan Africa-Nigeria inclusive as shown by different authors on the
issue. Uzor (2004) believes that the constraints faced by SMEs in developing
countries are not only accentuated with ineffective policy design, but also by
market failures in the region. Their lack of information technology and
knowledge of automation is gradually being reduced given that they serve as
contractors and or suppliers for larger firms particularly the foreign
manufacturing firms. A major difficulty faced by SMEs is that of lack of access
to short and long term capital. Publication of the Weekly Trust of Saturday,
January 22, 2011 recognizes the fact that collateral based financing has become
increasingly difficult for SMEs, whether as existing businesses, in their
expansion states or as startups hence more SMEs are resorting to viability
lending in which case they obtain loans based on the viability of the business
and health of cash flow, Banks are usually reluctant to lend to SMEs and this
is because of problems such as the SMEs’ inability to meet the bank’s lending
requirements, promoters’ low education, management and entrepreneurial skills
and poor and unreliable financial records which makes financial review
difficult (Aderemi, 2003). There is also the problem of unsound accounting
system and lack of full financial disclosure (Jan, n.d.). Areetey& Ahene,
(2004) buttressed this assertion by listing lack of access to land, utility
installation and services, and import procedures as constraints to SME
growth. Summarily, these problems make
SMEs a “high-risk” venture. The above named reasons are in and of themselves
problems that impede SME growth because not only do they become obstacles in
accessing financing, they are capable of hindering growth on their own. Moreso,
in Nigeria, the problems faced by SMEs as posited by Oboh (2002); Okpara
(2000); Wale-Awe (2000) and Chu, Kara & Benzing, (2008) include
astronomically high operating costs; lack of transparency and corruption; and
the lack of interest and lasting support for the SMEs sector by government
authorities, dilapidated state of Infrastructural facilities, unreliable
employees and Weak economy, unsafe location, undependable electricity supply
are common phenomenon.
2.6 Empirical Issues
According to Tomlin (2008), economists argue that the resources
smaller companies direct towards tax compliance are resources that could
otherwise be used for reinvestment, facilitating future growth. Hence, there is
a belief that taxes and a complex tax system put disproportionate pressure on
smaller businesses. Small taxpayers under the regular system of taxation are
discriminated against, since the compliance requirements, cost of compliance
and tax rate are the same for both small and large enterprises. Reducing the
compliance costs and tax rate increases the small enterprises profit margin. It
also increases the Government’s tax revenue, since the simplified provisions
for a micro enterprise historically reduce the size of the shadow economy and
the number of non complying registered taxpayers (Vasak, 2008). Furthermore,
SMEs usually have to operate in an overbearing regulatory environment with the
plethora of regulatory agencies, multiple taxes, cumbersome importation
procedure and high port charges that constantly exert serious burden on their
operations. Many SMEs have to deal with myriad of agencies at great cost as
stated earlier; they are heterogeneous and these differences in size and
structure may in turn carry differing obligations for record-keeping that
affect the costs to the enterprises of complying with (and to the revenue
authorities of administering) alternative possible tax obligations. Public
corporations, for example, commonly have stronger accounting requirements than
do sole proprietorships, and enterprises with employees may be subject to the
full panoply of requirements associated with withholding labour income taxes
and social contributions (International Tax Dialogue 2007).
An overly complex regulatory system and tax regime or one opaque in
its administration and enforcement makes tax compliance unduly burdensome and
often have a distortion effect on the development of SMEs as they are tempted
to morph into forms that offer a lower tax burden or no tax burden at all
(Masato, 2009) and this results in a tax system that imposes high expenses on
the society. A poorly executed tax system also leads to low efficiency, high
collection charges, waste of time for taxpayers and the staff, and the low
amounts of received taxes and the deviation of optimum allocation of resources
(Farzbod, 2000). Existing empirical evidence clearly indicates that small and
medium sized businesses are affected disproportionately by these costs: when
scaled by sales or assets, the compliance costs of SMEs are higher than for
large businesses (Weichenrieder, 2007), Among the factors militating against
SME tax compliance are: high tax rates,
Low efficiency, high collection charges, waste of time for taxpayers and the
staff, and the low amounts of received taxes and the deviation of optimum
allocation of resources (Farzbod, 2000). Others according to Yaobin, (2007) are
double taxation, no professional tax consultancy, weak tax planning, high
taxation cost.
Although there is certain policy measures geared towards SME growth
in Nigeria, the support needs to be increased, standardized and systematic.
Iwuji (2003) believes that it is the role of the government to provide an
enabling environment and social services that support businesses and persons.
This means enhancing the investment climate in Nigeria for increased economic
growth and subsequent tax contribution from all citizens which is necessary
because a good number of SMEs operate in the informal economy due to the fact
that they deem the tax environment within which they operate unfavorable. These
SMEs constitute untapped revenue potential and an even playing field in many
countries (International Tax Dialogue, 2007) as such they need to be captured
by the tax net. The legislation is a necessary regulator for protection of the
business environment and security of the economic agents, for establishment of
the necessary social security regulations but at the same time it hampers the
business with additional expenditures and administrative obstacles, which place
in different positions the SME. They can either share part of the staff or hire
people to deal only with studying the legal requirements and complying with the
new regulations, or contract some personal service firm (like E&Y, Deloitte
and Touché, Price Waterhouse etc) to deal with their tax compliance, planning etc.
For SME this is a great expense out of their abilities (Smatrakalev, 2006).
Shahroodi, (2010) believes that for a tax system to be efficient the tax policy
needs to be designed such that the tax rates are appropriate and rational, the
exemptions are lower in amount, the tax authorities are more efficient, the tax
burden of the indigent people should be lighter and the fight against
corruption and tax evasion should be strengthened. Tax policies can be designed
in such a way that they do not only directly affect SMEs but also indirectly
push for their growth for example the practice in China where tax policy has
been designed to encourage SME financing by granting exemptions from business
tax for financial corporations that provide guarantee for loans to SMEs and
granting tax deductions to market entities and venture capitalists that invest
in high- tech SMEs the tune of 70% of the investment value. Another way is by
designing tax policies that encourage human capital training. (Yaobin, 2007)
declared that special tax regimes for SMEs may he appropriate policy
instruments for minimizing the cost of collection, It is important to note that
the awareness of the dangers of inadequate attention to the taxation of SMEs
has grown. It can lead, for example, to distortions of competition as a result
of uneven tax enforcement, with incentives created to limit growth and to avoid
tax through artificial splitting of enterprises (International Tax Dialogue,
2007). Furthermore, policy incentives such as tax rebate for SMEs with emphasis
on local sourcing of raw materials, serious in adding value to commodities for
exports and other business ethics, should be employed by government. Similarly,
government could increase funding for the development of the sub-sector through
direct budgetary allocations and enhance private sector investment
opportunities that will focus on specific areas of capacity enhancement. Also, tax law should be simplified
continuously, mainly for three reasons, namely to lower both compliance costs and
administrative costs, to reduce uncertainty faced by taxpayers; and to improve
the levels of voluntary compliance (Kasipilai, 2005). Pro-business
(and Pro-SME) Tax regimes and enforcement should be simple, consistent and
predictable.
2.7 Theoretical Framework
2.7.1 Theory of Business Growth
Various authors have postulated theories on business growth. The
oldest and the most referred to theory, according to Elhiraika and Nkurunziza
(2006) is Gibrat’s law of proportionate effect (LPE); (1931). Here, Gibrat
stipulates that the rate of growth of a firm is independent of its initial
size. By implication it would mean that large firms are preferable in context
of private sector development given that they create more employment than small
firms. Conversely, Jovanovich (1982) states in his learning model that younger
firms learn over time, which helps them improve their performance as they
accumulate market knowledge. According to this model, young firms grow faster
than old ones. Moreover, given that younger firms business are usually smaller
than older ones for the reasons
discussed earlier; Jovanovich deduces that small firms grow faster than large
ones. This is a convergence process where small firms will eventually become as
large as any other longer firm in the same sector as time goes by.
Church and Lewis (1983) as cited in Olawale & Garire (2010) on
the other hand claim that as a new small firm start and develops, it moves
through some growth stages. He also identified the stages of growth as; existence,
survival, success, take off and resource maturity. In each stage of development
as different set of factors is critical to the firm’s survival and success the
Churchill Lewis model gives an insight into the dynamics of SMEs growth
including the distinguishing characteristics, problems and requirement of
growing SMEs and explains business growth process amongst SMEs, The precise
moment in time in which a startup venture becomes a new business has not yet
been theoretically determined. However, the ideal business survival could be
equated with a firm that has fully completed the transaction to stage - two
organizations in the five stages of small business growth.
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.0. Research Design
This research is a causal study. This is because it aims at
establishing causal relationship between two variables i.e. the relationship
between tax system and the performance of SMEs. Since it involved collecting
the views, perspectives or opinions of respondents regarding a particular issue
or research interest, the research employs the survey method that uses
questionnaire, personal interviews with respondents and perusal of past records
and publications. The choice of this method was made due to the fact that the
survey method is effective when it comes to getting opinions, attitudes and
descriptions as well as getting cause and effect relationships. The study uses
both qualitative and quantitative methods. The selection of small and medium
enterprises was done by judgmental sampling in order to attempt at obtaining a
fair representation of the population.
3.1 Target Population
For the purposes of this study the population designated comprised
of selected SME’s in the Kano
Metropolis who were registered about 1794000 tax payers. The study had (30%) small enterprises as the sample
populations of the accessible population. The study used quota sampling method,
because of the small population and the desire to reduce the sampling error;
all the categories of licensed owner managers were used. The quota sampling
method was suitable as some information related to specific category in the
licensing of enterprises.
3.2 Sample Size
The size of the sample and the way in which it is selected will
definitely have implications on the confidence one can have in the data and the
extent to which the team can generalize. The study sampled fifty (50) SMEs with
up to date information with respect to their tax payment.
3.3 Sampling Technique
Sampling is the process of selecting a sufficient number of elements from a
population so that by studying the sample and understanding the properties or
characteristics of the sample, researchers would be able to generalize the properties of the
sample to the population (Panitchparkdi, 2006).
In order to get very accurate result for this study, the purposive
sampling method was used to select the sample from the population. This method
is a non-random sampling technique where the researcher establishes a criterion
devoid of randomness for selecting the sample. In the purposive sampling, the
sample is chosen to suit the purposes of the study. These methods will be used
due to the time constraints and the difficulty involved in assessing the list
of all SMEs from the authorities. It will also help to target SMEs who are tax
payers and willing to accept the questionnaire.
3.4 Primary Data Collection
Questionnaires served as a preliminary data collection technique
for providing empirical analysis in the study. Both open- and closed- ended
questionnaire were self-administered. The nature of the study was explained to
the respondents,
hence the respondents’ confidentiality of any information provided was
assured. Respondents were provided with detailed instructions as to how the
questionnaires should be completed and returned. The rationale behind providing
clear instructions and assuring confidentiality of information is based on the
fact that this significantly reduces the likelihood of obtaining biased
responses.
3.5 Methods of Data Analysis
To analyze the effect of the tax system on SMEs performance,
regression method, particularly multiple linear regressions will be the major
statistical tool that will be used. The
reasons for using regression
method are: firstly,
almost all variables
in the present study
are measured by
interval/ratio scales; secondly,
if the sample
size is sufficient, regression
is undoubtedly a
more powerful way
to test the
relationship between two or more variables than other statistical
methods like non-parametric tests.
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Result and Discussion
4.1 Data Presentation
Table 4.1 depicts the gender distribution of the respondents. It
was observed that 52.9% of the respondents were males while 47.1% were females.
Fig. 4.1 shows the pie chart on the age of business in which 62% responded that
they had been in business between 5-10 years, while 28% responded that they had
been in business between 3 to 5 years, 7% had been in business between 10-15
years, 2% in business for over 15 years while 1% of respondents had less than 3
years in business.
Table
4.1: GENDER
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
MALE
|
54
|
52.9
|
52.9
|
52.9
|
FEMALE
|
48
|
47.1
|
47.1
|
100.0
|
Total
|
102
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Source:
Researcher Construct, 2018
Figure
4.1: Years in Business

Source:
Researcher Construct, 2018
The next issue was to assess the respondents’
perception on the tax system in general. Figure 4.2 shows the multiple responses to simple questions demanding YES or NO
answers. The analysis was to measure the respondent’s perception of existing
Tax-System in Kano state. Studies like Bank (2004)
found that the business environment in less developed countries are
characterized by high tax rates and cumbersome tax administration procedures.
Hence it was necessary to ask these questions to know the respondents’ perception
towards tax rates and tax concepts. As
presented in figure 4.2, most of respondents had negative perception towards
tax rates.
When the respondents were asked if they were
generally comfortable with the tax system in Kano state, the response were
that, only 12 out of 102 respondents agreed to be comfortable while the
remaining 88.2% of them said they were not comfortable at all. With this
uncomfortable tax regime in Kano state, only 19.6% of the respondents believe
the tax rates are fair to businesses. Questions were asked about the influence
of the tax system on the entire business, up to 72.5% of the respondents
believe the tax system affect their businesses (negatively) whiles 27.5% do not
see any impact of the system on their businesses.
With regards to the issue of Tax reliefs
(incentives) to SMEs, about 69.6% reported to avail no such benefits. This
raises an important question on the effectiveness of Tax systems as majority of
the surveyed SMEs with less than 10 years of age and during the initial growth
period; often the organizations require support in terms of such incentives.
Regarding training by the tax authority for the business owners, 88.2% of the
respondents received no such training. With the limited knowledge about the
core tax system and it legalities, only 44.1% of the respondents employ the
services of tax practitionists.
Figure 4.2 Response Chart

Source:
Researcher Construct, 2018
One of the possible impacts of increasing tax
is the corresponding increase in the prices and thus, purchases, which in turn
affect the growth of SMEs by influencing their competitiveness adversely. Table
4.2 presents the perceived impact of the tax increase on purchase of an
enterprise.
Table 4.2: Impact of tax on purchases
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
NEGATIVE
|
65
|
63.7
|
63.7
|
63.7
|
NEUTRAL
|
37
|
36.3
|
36.3
|
100.0
|
Total
|
102
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Source:
Researcher Construct, 2018
Table
4.3: Descriptive Statistics
|
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
PROFIT
|
102
|
300
|
84000
|
9944.12
|
14894.604
|
TIME
|
102
|
2
|
9
|
5.75
|
2.268
|
TAX PAID
|
102
|
100
|
9500
|
1109.31
|
1658.813
|
Valid N (listwise)
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
Source:
Researcher Construct, 2018
Regression
analysis
At this section, the study has determined the impact of the tax
system on the profitability of the SMEs by conducting the regression below
where the cost of employing a tax practionist had been omitted due to the fact
that the respondents could not provide accurate measure of the variable.
Table
4.5: Model Summary
R
|
R Square
|
Adjusted R Square
|
Std. Error of the Estimate
|
Durbin-Watson
|
0.618
|
0.382
|
0.357
|
11943.899
|
1.574
|
Source:
Researcher Construct, 2018
Table
4.6 regression output
Model
|
|
|
t
|
Sig.
|
|
Beta
|
Std. Error
|
||||
|
(Constant)
|
14362.916
|
7499.762
|
1.915
|
0.058
|
TIME
|
-456.659
|
536.916
|
-0.851
|
0.397
|
|
TAX PAID
|
5.354
|
0.792
|
6.761
|
0.000
|
|
IMPACT ON PURCHASES
|
-3439.708
|
2704.845
|
-1.272
|
0.207
|
|
TAX RELIEFS
|
1292.596
|
2851.778
|
0.453
|
0.651
|
Source:
Researcher Construct, 2018
The results from the regression analysis show
that the specified model was significant at 5% level of significance since the
p-value is less than 0.01. The R-square which measures how much of the
variation in the dependent variable is explained by the explanatory variables
is 0.382 implying that, up to 38.2% of the variations in the profit of the SMEs
can be explained by the independent variables. The results furthers show that
only the amount of tax paid significantly impacts the profit of the SMEs with p-value
of less than 0.01. The amount of time spent on filing tax returns and the
impact on purchases have no significant impact on the profitability of the
SMEs. Tax relief was treated as a binary variable with a score of 1 for yes and
0 otherwise. The results indicates it insignificant impact on the
profitability. This is understandable since the vast majority of the
respondents alluded to the fact that they were unaware of such reliefs nor even
benefited from them.
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Summary of Findings
Summary of findings for this research is based on the analysis of
data collected through questionnaire. These findings are:
(i)
That almost all the SMEs in
Kano pay taxes to government all the time.
(ii)
That multiple taxation
affects SMEs growth and survival negatively.
(iii)
That tax collectors do not
consider the size of a particular business in tax collection.
(iv)
That the relationship between
the size of SMEs and ability to pay taxes does not significantly affect their
survival. This means that despite the continuous taxing of SMEs by tax
agencies, SMEs continue to survive.
5.1 Conclusion
After the interpreted in section four, the main conclusion is that
taxes imposed on small and medium enterprises impact their growth in terms of
profits in different ways. From the study it has been found that changes in tax
rates lead to the changes in prices of various goods and services. The results
show that the increase in tax rates leads to higher production, distribution
and selling costs which lead to higher prices and as a result consumers change
their buying behaviour. People react to the higher prices by buying less of the
product.
Whenever prices increase due to increase in tax
rates; prices of goods and service increase and there is a drop in the
consumption rate and a decrease in sales volumes reducing profitability which
leads to retarded growth of SMEs. More so, tax payment is among the outflows of
cash from the business which reduce the purchasing power of an enterprise. This
is due to the fact that a large amount of cash collected is used to pay taxes
rather than to expand the business. The study shows that the purchasing power
of an enterprise drops immediately after the payment of taxes. That is why the
amount of tax paid relates negatively to the impact of taxes on purchases.
On incentives for SMEs growth in Kano
Municipality, most of them could not benefit from the tax system because they
are meant for fully registered SMEs only but even with the registered business
very few are aware of such incentives. This is because of the lack of education
and training for the SME operators. The many SMEs that operate in the informal
sectors cannot benefit from growth incentives.
5.2 Recommendations
Based on the findings made from this study, the following
recommendations are therefore made:
i.
Tax regulations governing
SMEs should be simplified in order to make compliance easier for them. This
includes clear and simple tax regulations, and an undemanding tax filing
process. The use of information technology should be encouraged.
ii.
Tax administrators should
carry out their duties more efficiently with the most care and integrity as
this will help combat issues such as multiple taxes.
iii.
Tax administrators should
improve their support services towards SMEs for example, small business owners
should be educated on issues such as taxes they are expected to pay and the
incentives and exemptions they are eligible for.
iv.
There were some very
important issues raised but the study did not look into their details. These
issues could be captured by interested researchers in future. Some suggested
areas for further studies include: Assessment of the role of tax towards the
growth of SMEs sector in Kano by focusing on different contexts; and the
perception of tax authorities / regulatory bodies towards the growth of Small
and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Kano.
REFERENCES
Aryeetey, E. & Ohene, A., 2004. Changing regulatory environment for smal-medium size
enterprises and their performance in Ghana.. s.l.,
Working Paper, p. 300594.
Aryeetey, E., 2001. Priority
Research Issues Relating to Regulation and Competition in Ghana. Manchester, University of Manchester.
Atawodi, O. W. & Ojeka,
S. A., 2012. Factors that affect tax compliance among small and medium
enterprises (SMEs) in north central Nigeria.. International
journal of business and management, 7(12).
Bank, W., 2004. Investment
Climate Assessment, Improving Enterprise Performance, s.l.: World Bank.
Baurer, L. I., 2005. Tax Administration and Small and Medium Entreprises (SMEs)
in Development Countries. s.l.:s.n.
Chipeta, C., 2002. The Second
Economy and Tax Yield in Malawi.. Nairobi,
s.n., p. Paper No. 113.
Enterprises in Asia and Pacific: Trend and
Prospects”. Publication of United Nation Economic and Social Commission ‘for
Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Studies in Trade and Investment Series Paper,
pg.1-31.
Fagbemi, O. T., Uadile, O. M.
& Noah, A. O., 2010. The ethics of tax evation: perpetual evidence from
Nigeria.. European Journal of Social Sciences,
17(3), pp. 360-371.
Farzbod, J. (2000).
“Investigation of the effective factors in the tax efficiency”. Unpublished
Master’s Thesis, Government Management Training Center, Tehran.
Gabay, B.K.G., Romotin, Jr. R.M., & Uy, E.A.M. (n.d).
Economics: Its Concepts and Principles.
Hanefah, M., Ariff, M. &
Kasipfflai, J. (2002). “Compliance Costs of Small and Medium Enterprises”.
Journal of Australian Taxation.
Holban, 0.L. (2007). “The
Taxation of Small and Medium Sized Enterprise — a hindering factor influencing
the European economic growth”. Doctoral Dissertation, Alexandry Loan Cuza
university of Lasi and Academy of Economics Studies from Bucharest Romania.
http://www.slideshare.net/gar
deviconceptsoftaxation.
International Tax Dialogue
(2007). “Taxation of SMEs”. Background Paper for the International Tax Dialogue
Conference, Bueons Aires.
Iwuji, G.I. (2003) Creating
awareness on tax matters for small and medium units. (PowerPoint Slide). www.doostoc.com
Kasipillai, J. (2005). A
Comprehensive Guide to Malaysian Taxation: Current Year Assessment. Kuala
Lumpur: McGraw-Hill
Marti, L. O., 2010.
Taxpayers' attitudes and tax compliance behaviour in Kenya.. African journal of business and management, Volume 1, pp. 112-122.
Masafo, A. (2009). “Globalization of Production and Competitiveness
of Small and Medium Size
Mnewa, R. & Maliti, E., 2008. The role of small business in poverty alleviation: The case
of Dar es Salaam, Tanzarnia.. s.l.,
Research Report.
Nigeria. Paper Presented at Central Bank of
Nigeria on Small and Medium Scale Industries Equity Investment Scheme (SMIEIS).
www.centbank.orgloutlpublicationlguideline/dfdi2004lsmieis.pdf.
Nwana, O.C. (1981), Introduction
to Educational Research for Student — Teachers. Heinemann Education Publisher.
Oboh, G.A.T. (2000). “Banks
Participation in the Promotion’ of SMEs”. Being a Paper Presented at the 6th
Follows and Associate.
Okpara, F.O. (2000), Entrepreneurship (Tax and Cases). Enugu
Nigeria Precision,
Olawale, F., & Garvwe, 0.
(2010). “Obstacles to the growth of New SMEs in South Africa: A Principal
Component Analysis Approach”. African Journal of Business Management, 4(5),
729-738.
Oludele, A. A. & Emilie,
C. K., 2012. Regulation, Awareness, Compliance and SME Performance in
Cameroon's Manufacturing and Retail Sectors.. International
Journal of Social Economics, 39(12).
Osita, Aguolu (2004).
Taxation and Tax Management in Nigeria. Meridian Association 36 Zik Avenue,
Uwani, Enugu.
Panitchparkdi, S. (2006).
Statement at the 10th Session of the Commission on Enterprise, Business
Facilitation and Development, Geneva, 21 February 2006. www.unctad.org/temp1ates/webfiyers.asp
Pope, J. & Abdul-Jabbar, H., 2008. Tax compliance costs of small and medium enterprises in
Malasia: Policy Implications. Malasia:
s.n.
Shahrodi, S.M.M. (2010).
“Investigation of the effective factors in efficiency of tax system”. Journal
of Accounting and Taxation, 2(3), 42-44.
Srnatrakalev, C. (2006). “Tax
Policy for SMEs”, Paper Delivered at 6th Global Conference on Business and
Economics. Gutman Conference Center
Stern, R.E., & Barbour,
P.A. (2005). Designing a small business tax system that enhances growth: Lesson
from Africa. www.fias,netnsf
Tomlin, B. (2008). Cleaning Hurdles: Key Reform to Make Small
Business More Successful.
U.S.A.
Udechukwu, F. N. (2003). Survey of Small and Medium Scale
Industries and their potentials in
Uzor, 0.0. (2004). “Small and
Medium Scale Enterprises Chester Development in South — Eastern Region of
Nigeria”. Institute for World Economics and International Management Paper
No.86.
No comments:
Post a Comment